Long Term Care Insurance Expert | Honey Leveen | Houston, TX

Helping you make informed LTC decisions

 
Request a Free, No-Obligation LTCi Quote
  • HOME
  • ABOUT
  • WHY LTCi
  • LTCi FAQs
  • PROCESS
  • TESTIMONIALS
  • ARTICLES
  • MEDIA
  • RESOURCES
  • VLOG
  • BLOG

So What if the Government Pays for Most LTC?

December 7, 2016 by Honey Leave a Comment

Money flying from WalletThe following is re-published courtesy of friend and highly respected colleague Stephen Moses, President of The Center for Long-Term Care Reform. Steve explains in a nutshell, why Americans are not more motivated to plan for paying for their own long-term care (LTC).

Tuesday, December 6, 2016

Seattle–

LTC Comment:  Heads up!  We’re about to explain why long-term care insurance sales have disappointed, why people don’t “use their homes to stay at home” and why LTC providers who depend on public financing are at risk.
LTC BULLET:  SO WHAT IF THE GOVERNMENT PAYS FOR MOST LTC?, 2015 DATA UPDATE

LTC Comment:  Once a year around this time the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) report health care expenditure data for the latest year of record.  Recently, CMS posted 2015 statistics on its website at http://www.cms.gov/Research-Statistics-Data-and-Systems/Statistics-Trends-and-Reports/NationalHealthExpendData/Downloads/Tables.zip.

Health Affairs has published a summary and analysis of the new data titled “National Health Spending:  Faster Growth In 2015 as Coverage Expands and Utilization Increases.”  Registered subscribers to Health Affairs can access the full text of that article here; the “Abstract” is available free.

Following is our annual analysis of the latest nursing home and home health care data.*

Heads Up:  This may be the most important LTC Bullet we publish all year.  It is the fourteenth in a row we’ve done annually analyzing the federal government’s enormous, and we argue, often detrimental, impact on long-term care financing.  If you’d like to see the earlier versions, go here and search for “So What if the Government Pays for Most LTC.”  You’ll find our yearly analyses of the data going back to “So What If the Government Pays for Most LTC, 2002 Data Update.”

——————

“So What If the Government Pays for Most LTC?, 2015 Data Update”
by
Stephen A. Moses

Ever wonder why LTC insurance sales and market penetration are so discouraging?  Or why reverse mortgages are rarely used to pay for long-term care?  Or why LTC service providers are always struggling to survive financially and still provide quality care?  Read on.

Nursing Homes

America spent $156.8 billion on nursing facilities and continuing care retirement communities in 2015.  The percentage of these costs paid by Medicaid and Medicare has gone up over the past 45 years (from 26.8% in 1970 to 55.7% in 2015, up 28.9 % of the total) while out-of-pocket costs have declined (from 49.2% in 1970 to 25.6% in 2015, down 23.6% of the total).  Source:  Table 15:  Nursing Care Facilities and Continuing Care Retirement Communities Expenditures; Levels, Percent Change, and Percent Distribution, by Source of Funds: Selected Calendar Years 1970-2015.

So What?  Consumers’ liability for nursing home and CCRC costs has declined by nearly half, down 48.0% in the past four decades while the share paid by Medicaid and Medicare has more than doubled, up 107.8%.

No wonder people are not as eager to buy LTC insurance as they would be if they were more at risk for the cost of their care!  No wonder they don’t use home equity for LTC when Medicaid exempts at least $552,000 and in some states up to $828,000 of home equity (as of 1/1/17).  No wonder nursing homes are struggling financially–their dependency on parsimonious government reimbursements is increasing while their more profitable private payers are disappearing.

Unfortunately, these problems are even worse than the preceding data suggest.  Over half of the so-called “out-of-pocket” costs reported by CMS are really just contributions toward their cost of care by people already covered by Medicaid!  These are not out-of-pocket costs in terms of ASSET spend down, but rather only INCOME, most of which comes from Social Security benefits, another financially struggling government program.  Thus, although Medicaid pays less than one-third of the cost of nursing home care (31.7% of the dollars in 2015), it covers nearly two-thirds (63%) of all nursing home residents.  Because people in nursing homes on Medicaid tend to be long-stayers, Medicaid pays something toward nearly 80 percent of all patient days.

So What?  Medicaid pays in full or subsidizes almost four-fifths of all nursing home patient days.  Even if Medicaid pays nothing with the entire amount due contributed from the recipient’s income, the nursing home receives Medicaid’s dismally low reimbursement rate. 

No wonder the public is not as worried about nursing home costs as they would be if they were more at risk for the cost of their care.  No wonder nursing homes risk insolvency when so much of their revenue comes from Medicaid, often at reimbursement rates less than the cost of providing the care.  The 2015 national projected shortfall in Medicaid reimbursement is $22.46 per patient day and over $7 billion in total.  Source:  2015 Report on Shortfalls in Medicaid Funding for Nursing Center Care.

Private Health Insurance

Don’t be fooled by the 8.6% of nursing home costs that CMS reports as having been paid by “private health insurance” in 2015.  That category does not include private long-term care insurance.  (See category definitions here.)  No one knows how much LTC insurance pays toward nursing home care, because many LTCI policies pay beneficiaries who then pay the nursing homes.  Thus, a large proportion of insurance payments for nursing home care gets reported as if it were “out-of-pocket” payments.  This fact further inflates the out-of-pocket figure artificially.

Assisted Living

How does all this affect assisted living facilities?  ALFs are 81% private pay (Source:  AHCA/NCAL Issue Brief) and they cost an average of $43,200 per year (Source:  Genworth 2015 Cost of Care Survey).  Many people who could afford assisted living by spending down their illiquid wealth, especially home equity, choose instead to take advantage of Medicaid nursing home benefits.  Medicaid exempts one home and all contiguous property (up to $552,000 or $828,000 depending on the state), plus—in unlimited amounts—one business, one automobile, prepaid burials, term life insurance, personal belongings and Individual Retirement Accounts not to mention wealth protected by sophisticated asset sheltering and divestment techniques marketed by Medicaid planning attorneys.  Income rarely interferes with Medicaid nursing home eligibility unless such income exceeds the cost of private nursing home care.

So What?  For most people, Medicaid nursing home benefits are easy to obtain without spending down assets significantly and Medicaid’s income contribution requirement is usually much less expensive than paying the full cost of assisted living. 

No wonder ALFs are struggling to attract enough private payers to be profitable.  No wonder people are not as eager to buy LTC insurance as they would be if they were more at risk for the cost of their care.  This problem has been radically exacerbated in recent years because more and more state Medicaid programs are paying for assisted living as well as nursing home care, which makes Medicaid eligibility more desirable than ever.

Home Health Care

The situation with home health care financing is very similar to nursing home financing.  According to CMS, America spent $88.8 billion on home health care in 2015.  Medicare (39.6%) and Medicaid (36.1%) paid 75.7% of this total and private insurance paid 10.6%.  Only 9.9% of home health care costs were paid out of pocket.  The remainder came from several small public and private financing sources.  Data source:  Table 14:  Home Health Care Services Expenditures; Levels, Percent Change, and Percent Distribution, by Source of Funds: Selected Calendar Years 1970-2015.

So What?  Only one out of every ten dollars spent on home health care comes out of the pockets of patients and a large portion of that comes from the income (not assets) of people already on Medicaid.

No wonder the public does not feel the sense of urgency about this risk that they would if they were more at risk for the cost of their care.

Bottom line, people only buy insurance against real financial risk.  As long as they can ignore the risk, avoid the premiums, and get government to pay for their long-term care when and if such care is needed, they will remain in denial about the need for LTC insurance.  As long as Medicaid and Medicare are paying for a huge proportion of all nursing home and home health care costs while out-of-pocket expenditures remain only nominal, nursing homes and home health agencies will remain starved for financial oxygen.

The solution is simple.  Target Medicaid financing of long-term care to the needy and use the savings to fund education and tax incentives to encourage the public to plan early to be able to pay privately for long-term care.  For ideas and recommendations on how to implement this solution, see www.centerltc.com.

Filed Under: Elephant in the Room, Helpful Information About LTC Tagged With: Long Term Care insurance, LTCi

Happy Long-Term Care Awareness Month!

November 2, 2016 by Honey Leave a Comment

Long Term Care insurance is Good for America imageNovember is National Long-Term Care Awareness Month (LTCAM). The US Congress created LTCAM so that people would learn more about how hight long term care insurance costs can be.

LTCAM is well recognized by a number of Governors, including Rick Perry and George W. Bush. Houston’s own Mayors Bill White and Annise Parker have issued LTCAM proclamations.

Local, state and national governments recognize how unprepared citizens are. When it comes to being able to afford often catastrophically expensive long-term care (LTC) costs, many of us are unprepared. Our government will not be able to adequately bear the costs of providing LTC. Long term care insurance costs are often a fraction of actual long term care costs.

Does Medicare pay for long-term care? No! Not type of care most Americans need. When long term care lasts for more than a short time, costs can be catastrophic. How much does long term care cost? Visit the Cost of Care Calculator at www.Genworth.com to find out.

The purpose of LTCAM is to raise awareness of the need to plan responsibly for LTC, right now! This is the very best way to ensure dignity, options, access and choices if LTC is necessary.

Unfortunately, the odds of needing LTC are high. You protect against other risks, like a car accident or house fire. The need for LTC is more likely than a house fire or car accident. LTC often costs more than a car or a house. If you’re not prepared, a lengthy LTC need puts your savings and retirement, and family at risk.

Just as it is smart to plan ahead for retirement, it’s smart to plan now for long-term care.

Please check the Resources page of my site for comprehensive, reputable information on LTC.

If you haven’t yet planned for your LTC, I urge you to do so.

 

 

Filed Under: Denial, Elephant in the Room, Helpful Information About LTC, Information About LTC, Long-Term Care Awareness Month Tagged With: Long Term Care insurance, long-term care, Long-Term Care Awareness Month, LTCAM

Medicaid’s Woes Highlighted

October 14, 2016 by Honey Leave a Comment

MedicaidThis past month I’ve come across a few articles describing Medicaid’s woes, and highlighting peoples need to plan for funding their own long-term care, now!

This Washington Post story describes why our system is incentivized to discharge patients when they are still very needy, but their Medicare-paid re-hab benefits are exhausted. Medicaid can then often pick up costs, but it pays facilities poorly. This incentivizes facilities to admit the least needful and costly patients. In addition, “The Medicaid system is overly cumbersome and too slow to provide benefits.”

The true heroines of long-term care, paid home care providers, earn an average of $10.11 an hour, states this September New York Times article. About a third of these caregivers rely on food stamps and 28% rely on Medicaid for health insurance. Annual caregiver job turnover rate is 40-60 percent.

The article continues by stating caregivers at Medicaid-funded facilities got their pay raised to minimum wage: $7.15 per hour last year. Such caregivers are often overwhelmed with the sheer number of patients they must care for. “Ms. Walker left her job at a nearby nursing home because “sometimes you had 12 to 15 people to take care of,” she said. “You’re trying to feed everybody, give them baths, but a lot of people got neglected.”

This testimonial about Medicaid’s flaws on the receiving end of care is heart-wrenching, “When Roy Potter was weakened from postpolio syndrome and his wife, Joan, could no longer help him out of bed, a nursing home was “unthinkable,” said Ms. Potter, 83.

For a year, they paid private aides $14 an hour to come to their home in Mount Kisco, N.Y. When they could no longer afford that, Mr. Potter qualified for Medicaid, which pays the preponderance of home care costs in this country.

Over the next two and a half years, more than a dozen agency aides — some caring and competent; some not; some disappearing without explanation — cycled through their home, as did a number of short-term substitutes.

“A new person would come, and I’d have to walk them through everything all over again,” Ms. Potter said.

She grew increasingly anxious about whether an aide would show up. “Every morning I’d hold my breath until the doorbell rang,” she said. “Several times, I had to get in the car and drive to the agency and say, ‘Who is coming today?’”

Last year, when federal overtime provisions took effect, the agency cut back helpers’ hours.

She and her children succeeded in keeping Mr. Potter at home until he died in April, at 86, but finding and keeping help proved a continual battle.

Filed Under: Elephant in the Room, Helpful Information About LTC, I'll Just Self-Insure Tagged With: home care, Medicaid, Medicare, New York Times, nursing facilities, Nursing Homes, Postpolio Syndrome, Washington Post

Ding Dong the Wicked Witch of LTCi Rate Hikes is Dead

September 9, 2016 by Honey Leave a Comment

The following is a guest blog by my friend and highly respected LTCi colleague, Ron Hagelman, who can be reached at rhagelman@broadtowerinsurance.com, www.BroadtowerInsurance.com.

The article laments the undeserved, unintended ill-will earned by the LTCi industry. Ron’s sentiment matches my own and expresses the widespread confidence of LTCi actuaries that LTCi pricing is now extremely rate stable. Here are blogs I’ve written about rate hikes.

Here is info on the Society of Actuaries study Ron refers to.  Thanks, Ron, for allowing me to re-publish this.

Wicked Witch“There are simply those who, even after repeated exposure to the glare of the truth, are subsequently unable to admit they were wrong. Our industry suffers seriously from this flaw in human behavior. Far too many have conveniently pointed the finger of blame at those responsible for our lifeless interest environment (whoever those people are) and not taken sufficient responsibility for the “mistakes” that were made in our past pricing assumptions. “We” got it way wrong and the damage done to all concerned is much more extensive than many are willing to admit. Stand-alone LTCI sales are a shadow of their former selves. The destruction to new sales caused by repeated rate increases is pervasive and insidious. We have unfortunately created a general public malaise and aversion to all things LTCI both in terms of those who we said were the smart ones for leveraging their risk early and those prospective buyers considering the security of policy ownership. What is of course much worse is that we have successfully decimated the ranks of those willing to help sell the product. The age-old equation is now painfully obvious to all concerned: rising premium creating falling sales culminating in a drastically reduced field force. This artificially created sales spiral is much more than just a self-fulfilling prophecy. We must first admit that it is also a self-inflicted wound.

We must first freely admit and acknowledge our own culpability. Frankly, we over built benefits, underpriced mortality and morbidity, and overestimated potential sales in the initial rush to achieve market share. We completely missed the whole side of the barn in terms of persistency and honestly we were basing our future experience on far too little actual claims data.

That Has All Changed!

“Ding Dong the Wicked (Rate Increase) Witch is Dead!” The Society of Actuaries has recently completed a research project designed specifically to evaluate the historical potential for rate increases.   The research clearly indicates that products priced today are much less likely to have future rate increases. What is absolutely certain over the last 15 years is that the need for long term care services and support, the growth of assets and income needing protection, and the certainty of a need for expensive care is now greater than ever. We have also accumulated a substantial volume of claims information upon which to more accurately base current pricing.

The conclusion of the SOA analysis is that confidence in current pricing “should” be at an all-time high. Claims data is no longer scarce. We have an abundance of claims to evaluate at this time, meaning we have reduced the potential likelihood of future rate actions. According to the SOA, “Premium stability on today’s LTCI prod- ucts is at its highest.” The SOA identified a number of benefits of the new pricing stability as the study found that, “Claim experience nationwide in 2014 was 70 times more credible than in 2000.” The fact that we now have a history to evaluate has laid the groundwork for future carrier optimism concerning this market. Pricing stability contributes to:

  • Greater carrier confidence in assumptions concerning lapse, morbidity and mortality.
  • Less operational administrative risk translating into lower expenses. Constant change is expensive.
  • Less friction on the regulatory level and potential stress on reserves.

Restoration of consumer confidence at this point is a massive undertaking.

The Study also illuminated the validity of what we knew were serious contributing factors:

  • Long term investment return has fallen dramatically from 6.4 percent in 2000 to 4.6 percent in 2014.
  • Commissions have crept up during the same period of time, emphasizing first year compensation, and while administration expenses have declined.
  • Based on experience, allowable margins for error have also increased.

What is important is that we have learned from our experience and that the relative predictability of current premiums has risen from a low of a 40 percent chance of a future need to raise premiums to only 10 percent today. The study also pointed out that the regulatory environment has provided evolving strength by implementing the necessity of providing adequate margins for adverse circumstances under the NAIC Model Regulations beginning in 2000 and subsequently enhanced in 2009 and 2014.

The journey now standing before us must certainly begin by joining hands with those new friends willing to take that first step on the yellow brick road as we must ask the wizard to help us restore the faith of consumers and agents alike. Together we must recognize that we have indeed survived the flying monkeys and that our strength of purpose to find a home for the risk that will not be ignored was always built upon our brains, our heart and our courage.

Other than that I have no opinion on the subject.”

Filed Under: Helpful Information About LTC, I'll Just Self-Insure, Information About LTC Tagged With: LTCi rate hikes, LTCi Rates, Ron Hagelman, Society of Actuaries

One More Example of Media getting LTCi Very, Very Wrong

September 3, 2016 by Honey 4 Comments

Media ErrorHere’s an example of pundits getting long-term care insurance (LTCi) very, very wrong. Wrong to the point that it is harmful to the public because it dissuades people from considering LTCi by using false information.

The author turned to “one sharp advisor” who is unfortunately not well educated in LTCi and as a result, advised self-insuring. This is bad advice. Too many advisors fail to understand that the primary benefit of LTCi is rapid, worry- and stress-free access to long-term care without hesitation and without fear of threatening the health, financial, or emotional status of their loved ones. “One sharp advisor” and the author do not mention these benefits. All they are concerned about is wealth preservation, which is a secondary consideration.

The author, Richard Eisenberg, also picked an LTCi agent named Irv, to make LTCi recommendations.  Here’s what Irv did wrong.  He said, “…my wife and I would need to spend an hour with him on the phone so he could ask us some questions.” Health questions should never take more than a few minutes…period. They should never be the conversational focus point.  Irv went on to say that “…if I chose to wait five more years to buy the policy he recommended from Mutual of Omaha, I’d be rejected. That company won’t sell long-term care coverage to someone who has had diabetes for 20 years.”  This is a false,  manipulative, scare tactic.  Irv is an embarrassment to my profession.  

Mr. Eisenberg wrote eloquently about why it is very important for him to own LTCi.  I feel sorry for Mr. Eisenberg because of the poor advice that he received from both parties. He is a very smart guy, evidently very in touch with his feelings and the realities of what long-term care entails. I fear that doubt about his decision to abort his search for reasonably priced long-term care insurance will grow through the years and will haunt him during retirement.

The last way to find a good LTCi agent is through direct mail, as Mr. Eisenberg did. Try your friends, colleagues, and the internet first. Visit agent websites before you call. This is how ALL my clients find me.

Wade Pfau, a noted financial advisor with more credentials than “one sharp advisor”, gets LTCi right. Smart financial advisors do.

What a pity. Many people are harmed by published falsehoods about LTCi.

Filed Under: Denial, Elephant in the Room, Helpful Information About LTC Tagged With: False Information, LTCi, Next Avenue, Richard Eisenberg, Wade Pfau

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • …
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • …
  • 56
  • Next Page »

Contact Me

Phone: 713-988-4671
Fax: 281-829-7177

Email: honey@honeyleveen.com

Videos go here.

From My Blog

Podcast Illuminates LTC Need

Thanks to my long-time friend, client, beloved former radio personality, actress, author, passionate … [Read More...]

LTCI is Magical at Time of Need!

This is an actual, unsolicted, very meaningful, touching cleint testimonial, just recieved. I pasted … [Read More...]

Testimonials

Open Quotation Mark"Honey - Whenever I need a clarification regarding our “LTC” you are “Johnny on the spot” responding in a very prompt manner, reassuring me, informing me in a concise way, patient with me as I massage the understanding in my own words. Your knowledge is current and expressed with confidence, offered in your conscientious and upbeat personality. Quotation Mark ClosedIt is a pleasure to work with you. Thank you for your expertise." ~ Nancy Damon, Houston, TX
Read more

Thanks for visiting my site! I like hearing from you!

Here’s how to reach me:

Honey Leveen, LUTCF, CLTC, LTCP
“The Queen, by Self-Proclamation, of Long-Term Care Insurance (LTCi)”
404 Royal Bonnet
Ft. Myers, FL 33908

Phone: 713-988-4671
Fax: 281-829-7177

Email: honey@honeyleveen.com

Email: honey@honeyleveen.com

©Honey Leveen, Queen of Long-Term Care Insurance 2011-2015 ~ All Rights Reserved ~ Customization of Genesis Framework by Weborization